(엠바고 없음) 흑색종 치료에 의미있는 개선 보인 병용 요법
전문가 의견 26-098 모더나-머크 맞춤형 mRNA 암 백신 병용 요법, 임상 3상 긍정적 결과

2026.8.20. **엠바고 없음**
> SMCK 등록 기자는 더 많은 정보를 접하실 수 있습니다. -> 기자 등록하기
  • 배경
    • 19일(현지시간), 모더나의 맞춤형 mRNA 암백신과 머크의 면역항암제 병용 요법을 시험한 임상 3상 중간 결과가 공개됐습니다.
      • 3상 INTerpath-001 임상시험은 2B~4기 흑색종 환자를 대상으로 새로운 mRNA 기반 개인 맞춤형 신항원 치료제(INT) 인티스메란 오토진(intismeran; V940 또는 mRNA-4157)과, 머크의 항PD-1 치료제인 키트루다(펨브롤리주맙)를 병행 투여하는 보조 요법입니다. 
    • 고위험 흑색종을 대상으로 한 실험에서 통계적으로 유의하고 의미있는 임상적 개선을 입증했다고 두 회사는 밝혔습니다.
      • 임상시험 설계에서는 전신 치료 경험이 없는 환자 1137명을, 인티스메란 1mg 3주 간격 투여(최대 9회 투여)와 약 1년간 펨브롤리주맙 병용 투여군과 펨브롤리주맙 단독 투여군으로 2:1 비율로 무작위 배정했습니다.
      • 모더나와 머크는 이 임상시험의 중간 분석에서, 전신 치료를 받은 적이 없는 완전 절제된 2B기, 2C기, 3기 또는 4기 피부 흑색종 환자에서 보조 요법으로 인티스메란과 키트루다 병용 요법을 시행했을 때, 키트루다 단독 요법에 비해 무재발 생존율(RFS) 및 무병 생존율(DMFS)에서 통계적으로 유의미하고 임상적으로 중요한 개선을 보였다고 밝혔습니다.
    • 양사는 향후 개최될 국제 의학 학회에서 관련 데이터를 발표할 예정입니다.
 

  • 참여 전문가
    • 구본경 기초과학연구원(IBS) 유전체교정연구단장
      • 추가되는 의견은 후속으로 전하겠습니다.
    • 해외(영국 및 스페인) SMC 의견도 첨부했습니다.
기자 여러분은 아래 주의사항을 참고해 활용해주시길 부탁드립니다.
  • 엠바고는 없습니다. 자유롭게 활용 가능합니다.
  • 되도록 원문을 그대로 활용해주시길 부탁드립니다.
  • SMCK를 꼭 인용할 필요는 없습니다. 만약 인용 출처가 필요한 경우, 아래 형식을 따를 수 있습니다.
    • "ㅇㅇㅇ(전문가)는 한국과학기술미디어센터에 ㅁㅁㅁ라고 말했다."

구본경 기초과학연구원(IBS) 유전체교정연구단장
*2026.8.20.

이 결과는 암의 돌연변이를 분석해 신항원(neoantigen)을 선별하고, mRNA 백신으로 만들어 면역반응을 유도하는 개인맞춤형 치료가 3상 임상에서도 효과를 보일 수 있음을 보여준 성과입니다. 이번 임상은 절제된 IIB–IV기 흑색종(melanoma) 환자만을 대상으로 했으며, 펨브롤리주맙(pembrolizumab)과 병용해 무재발생존(RFS)과 원격전이무발생생존(DMFS)을 개선했습니다. 발표 당일 모더나 주가가 전일 대비 약 177% 상승한 것도 시장이 이를 mRNA 암백신 플랫폼의 검증으로 받아들였음을 보여줍니다. 다만 현재는 중간분석(interim analysis) 결과여서 효과의 크기와 전체생존(OS)은 상세 데이터 공개 후 판단해야 합니다.


이 전략은 흑색종, 흡연 관련 폐암, MSI-high 암처럼 돌연변이 부담(TMB)이 높아 신항원을 찾기 쉬운 암에서 유리합니다. 반대로 돌연변이가 적거나 후성유전학적 변화(epigenetic alteration)가 종양 발생을 주도하는 암에서는 적용 가능한 표적이 제한될 수 있습니다. 따라서 이번 결과는 모든 암을 정복할 백신이라기보다, 흑색종에서 개인맞춤형 면역치료가 임상 전략으로 성립할 수 있음을 보여준 증거로 보는 것이 적절합니다.


아래는 영국 사이언스 미디어 센터(UK SMC)에서 수집한 전문가 의견입니다. 영국 SMC 홈페이지에서도 보실 수 있습니다.

Sam Barrell, CEO of LifeArc, said:

“These results are encouraging because they suggest treatments made for an individual patient, even in common conditions, may be moving closer to everyday clinical use. They indicate that highly personalised treatments can be developed, tested and potentially delivered on a much larger scale than previously thought. While this research focuses on cancer, the lessons could have implications far beyond this field, helping build confidence in more tailored approaches to treatment, including for rare conditions that are often driven by unique genetic mutations.”

 


Prof Marco Gerlinger, Professor of Gastrointestinal Cancer Medicine and Consultant Medical Oncologist, Barts Cancer Institute, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, said:

What is this personalised cancer vaccine and how does it work?

“A personalised cancer vaccine is designed by first identifying mutations in the DNA of a cancer and then working out which mutations encode for proteins that get presented to immune cells on the surface of the cancer cells. Over 30 such mutations can then be selected for vaccine manufacturing. As the selection is done for each individual cancer, it is a personalised product. The vaccine technology is very similar to many Covid vaccines which use RNA. RNA that encodes the identified mutations is then injected under the skin ever 3 weeks and at the same time patients received another immunotherapy called pembrolizumab. The idea is that the personalised neoantigen vaccine educates the immune cells to recognize the cancer cells whereas pembrolizumab takes the breaks off the immune cells and helps them to have maximum effect.    

 

What can we know from these results? What details are still to come?

“The press release only announced that the study is positive, and we don’t have any details yet. The main aim of the study was to show that recurrence free survival improves when patients receive the vaccine. This has been achieved but we don’t know yet how much lower the recurrence rate for example at 3 years is. These results may be presented at one of the big oncology conferences in autumn. How much long-term survival improves is almost certainly not know yet as the patients will need to be followed for longer but recurrence free survival correlates well with this. 

 

How significant are these findings?

“I think it is fair to call it a breakthrough in the development of new cancer immunotherapies as it is the first phase 3 study that shows that a vaccine can protect against recurrences of one of the deadliest cancer types. This is certainly good news for patients with melanoma, but the study has much wider implications. It provides proof of principle that personalised cancer vaccines work. This is important as they can be designed against many different cancer types. I am hopeful that we will see similar successes of this technology in a range of cancer types such as colon cancer where a large study has been performed.“

 


Dr Yin Wu, a Wellcome Trust Career Development Fellow at King’s College London, said:

Personalised cancer vaccine:

“The vaccine has been developed to target mutations specific to each patient’s cancer. This in theory makes the vaccine safer (as only cancer cells, rather than normal cells, should have these mutations) and potentially more effective. 

 

What we know about these results:

“We know that the addition of V940 (personalised vaccine) to a standard therapy of pembrolizumab is better than pembrolizumab alone at preventing melanoma from coming back after surgery for patients with high-risk disease. How much better is not yet known until more data is released and at what cost is this gain? For example, how much more toxicity and/or cost does this add to standard therapy? If the benefit of adding V940 is small (e.g. a few percentage points), whilst the increase in toxicity or cost is high, then the impact of this treatment may be diminished. From the earlier phase 2 trial though, we know the combination treatment does not add much more toxicity to standard therapy, so this is likely to be the case for the phase 3 trial. 

 

How significant are these findings?

“This is the first phase 3 study to demonstrate improved recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival for a combination adjuvant treatment over anti-PD-1 (e.g. pembrolizumab) adjuvant therapy in melanoma which is significant in itself. How significant will depend on the details to be released later.”

 


Dr Lennard Lee, Consultant Medical Oncologist, Associate Professor and Senior National Clinical Adviser on Cancer Vaccines, University of Oxford, said:

What is this personalised  cancer vaccine and how does it work?

“Personalised cancer vaccines are a fundamentally different way of thinking about cancer treatment. Rather than giving every patient the same medicine, a treatment is designed specifically for the individual patient and the unique genetic fingerprint of their cancer.

“A sample of the patient’s tumour is analysed to identify mutations that distinguish the cancer cells from healthy cells. These mutations can generate abnormal proteins, known as neoantigens, which can potentially be recognised by the immune system. The vaccine uses mRNA to provide instructions corresponding to selected neoantigens, with the aim of training the patient’s immune system, particularly its T cells, to recognise and attack cancer cells carrying them.

“In this trial, each personalised treatment encodes up to 34 neoantigens and is given alongside pembrolizumab, an established immunotherapy. In simple terms, one treatment helps show the immune system what to look for, while the other helps release the brakes on the immune response.

 

What can we know from these results, and what details are still to come?

“What we know today is important. This was a large Phase III randomised trial involving 1,137 patients with surgically removed, high-risk melanoma, and the trial met its primary endpoint.

“According to the topline announcement, patients receiving the personalised mRNA cancer vaccine alongside pembrolizumab had a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in recurrence-free survival compared with pembrolizumab alone. The study also met the important secondary endpoint of distant metastasis-free survival.

“That is very encouraging. We should now look forward to seeing the complete data. We do not yet have the magnitude of the Phase III benefit, the detailed subgroup analyses, quality-of-life data or mature overall-survival results. Those details will allow the scientific and clinical community to understand precisely how large the benefit is, which patients benefit most, and ultimately where this treatment might sit within routine melanoma care.”

 

How significant are these findings?

“These findings are significant. This is the first positive Phase III trial of an individualised neoantigen therapy and an mRNA-based cancer treatment. That makes this an important moment for a field that scientists have been working towards for many years. Within 6 years of the pandemic, we have mRNA vaccines to treat cancer. 

“There is also a wider story here about what happened after the pandemic. In 2020, enormous global investment accelerated mRNA technology, vaccine science and manufacturing, and it started in the United Kingdom. The question afterwards was whether that capability could be redirected towards other major diseases.

“In 2022, the UK made an early strategic decision to pursue that opportunity in cancer, launching a national cancer vaccine advance to accelerate clinical trials of mRNA cancer vaccines. It forms part of our AI For Science Plan, our 10-year cancer plan, and our modern industrial strategy. Since then, the UK has developed into one of the world’s leading environments for cancer vaccine trials. Nearly 50 cancer centres have contributed to this national effort, including through programmes such as the NHS Cancer Vaccine Launch Pad and Vaccine Innovation Pathway, alongside expert contributions to the MHRA. We have even made a major push into AI, using our AI Supercomputer to significantly improve design of these vaccines.”

 

Declared interests

Sam Barrell: Sam Barrell is CEO of LifeArc, a self-funded medical research organisation turning promising science into patient impact, with a focus on rare diseases and drug-resistant infections. LifeArc contributed to the early development of pembrolizumab (Keytruda) and has received royalty income associated with the medicine. These funds support LifeArc’s charitable activities and investment in medical research and innovation.

Prof Marco Gerlinger: “Institutional research funding from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Bristol Myers Squibb and Roche. Advisory fees from GSK, Roche, MSD (Merck), Merck KGaA and Jazz. Speaker fees and travel support from MSD (Merck), Roche, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Bristol Myers Squibb, Servier, Takeda and Natera. Principle investigator on a BioNTech neoantigen vaccine trial.”

Dr Lennard Lee: “I am a University of Oxford academic and NHS consultant and have served as a Senior National Clinical Adviser on cancer vaccines to the UK Government. I lead UK academic research programmes developing cancer vaccines, including research involving AI and supercomputing. I have previously held senior roles within the Office for Life Sciences and served as Chief Medical Officer of the Ellison Institute of Technology.”

For all other experts, no reply to our request for DOIs was received.

아래는 스페인 사이언스 미디어 센터(SMC Spain)에서 수집한 전문가 의견입니다. 스페인 SMC 홈페이지에서도 보실 수 있습니다.

Marisol Soengas, jefa del Grupo de Melanoma del Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), dice: 

“La noticia es importante. No se presentan los resultados, porque no hay publicación científica; se anuncian los resultados intermedios de un ensayo en fase 3. Ha salido el anuncio antes que la publicación, y se indica que se va a presentar en un congreso.  

¿Por qué ha llamado tanto la atención? Primero, es un ensayo fase 3, que son más de mil pacientes en melanoma y además, por la tecnología. Se trata de vacunas personalizadas, a medida para cada paciente. Se consigue, primero, secuenciando el ADN, para identificar las mutaciones. Luego, secuenciando el ADN normal y del tumor; y después, secuenciando a nivel de ARN, para ver cuántas de esas alteraciones se expresan y cuáles pueden ser reconocidas por el sistema inmunitario. 

Esto es una parte del tratamiento. La otra parte es la combinación con el pembrolizumab, para reducir todos los frenos que las células tienen en el sistema inmunitario, sus múltiples mecanismos de protección. Y, además, lo que tiene que conseguirse es que el sistema inmunitario reconozca el tumor activamente. Para eso tienen este otro componente del tratamiento, y el resultado son los hasta 34 factores que están alterados, que están expresados en la célula tumoral. 

El ensayo lo han hecho en adyuvancia, o sea, tras cirugía. Se han eliminado los tumores (primarios, ganglio, y parece que también algunas metástasis). Lo que se mide es cuánto tiempo tarda el tumor en aparecer tras la cirugía, la progresión libre de enfermedad y la progresión libre de metástasis.  

¿Por qué es interesante? Por la tecnología de RNA. Hasta este momento, no se disponía de una forma en la que podías reconocer 34 alteraciones de proteínas específicas de un paciente, y lo han combinado con este inmunomodulador. La idea es conseguir que el sistema inmunitario ataque en lo posible estas células tumorales.  

¿Qué queda por hacer? Bueno, primero tenemos que ver los resultados finales. Y lo que quizás preocupa es cómo de generalizable va a ser, porque esto va paciente a paciente; y también el coste para los sistemas de salud, si es asumible un tratamiento tan personalizado. Quizá en el futuro puedan encontrarse alteraciones que son muy comunes, pero en este momento es personalizable. 

En principio, son expectativas muy prometedoras, con cautela, de un ensayo tecnológicamente muy complejo”. 


No declara conflictos de interés. 

  
한국과학기술미디어센터(SMCK) 소개

한국과학기술미디어센터는 근거 기반의 과학 정보를 언론에 제공하는, 과학계와 미디어 사이의 다리 역할을 하는 독립 비영리 조직입니다. 잘못된 정보와 가짜 뉴스가 넘쳐나는 세상에서, 제대로 된 전문가의 해설과 의견을 빠르고 다양하게 기자들에게 제시하고 이를 체계적으로 아카이빙하는 역할을 합니다.
2025년 7월 이사회를 구성하고(이사장 노정혜 전 한국연구재단 이사장) 센터장(이근영 전 한겨레 과학전문기자)을 선임했으며, 같은해 9월 개소식을 열며 활동을 시작했습니다.

*참고 기사: 
  
SMCK 역할
SMCK는 세 분야 전문가인 과학자, 기관 커뮤니케이터(홍보팀), 기자에게 구체적인 도움을 드리고자 설립됐습니다. 각각 아래와 같습니다.
  • 과학자, 연구자에게는 의견과 해설이 온전한 맥락과 함께 제공되는 안전한 발언 공간이 돼줍니다. 선의를 위해 한 논평이 기사화 과정에서 왜곡되거나 부정확하게 변질될 우려를 줄이는 완충 작용을 합니다. 
  • 기관 홍보 담당자에게는 기관의 성과를 기자들에게 보다 객관적이고 정교하게 알리고, SMC 글로벌 네트워크를 통해 영향력을 높일 기회를 제공합니다. 
  • 기자에게는 사안을 해석하는 데 도움이 될 치우침 없는 종합적인 정보를 빠르고 풍성하게 제공하고, 이를 통해 기사에서 과학과 기술을 보다 자유롭고 편리하게 활용하도록 돕습니다.
SMCK는 이를 통해, 궁극적으로 근거에 기반해 사안을 합리적으로 판단하고 이것이 정책에까지 반영되는 사회를 만드는 데 기여하고자 합니다.

해외 협력
사이언스미디어센터(SMC)는 2002년 영국에서 최초로 설립됐고 현재 호주와 뉴질랜드, 독일, 스페인, 대만, 아일랜드 등으로 확장됐습니다. 한국은 2025년 12월, 7번째 센터로 합류했습니다. 글로벌 네트워크에 포함된 8개 조직은 엄격한 독립성과 신뢰성이라는 가치를 공유하고 있으며 협력을 통해 주요한 국제 과학 이슈에 공동 대응하고 있습니다.
지속적으로 SMCK의 전문가 해설 및 의견을 받아보길 원하신다면 아래 링크에 등록해주세요.
📌 기자 등록하고 전문가 의견 받기 >
* 지난 의견은 '지난 의견 다시 보기'를 선택해주세요.
내용문의: 윤신영 미디어국장 yoonsy@smck.or.kr
비상 연락(당직 전화): 010-4440-5450
한국과학기술미디어센터(SMCK)
news@smck.or.kr
서울특별시 종로구 새문안로 92, 1209호 / 02-6203-5450
수신거부 Unsubscribe