Preparatory Issue 18
February 2023  
 Actual Vested Rights vs. the Vested Rights Frame

This month, in his graduation speech at Yonsei University, President Yoon Suk-yeol said, "Innovation is achieved when we break with vested interests and create a freer and fairer system together." Looking at the Yoon administration's directions and policies, one would think it protected the "vested interests". Perhaps, it has more to do with how Yoon understands "vested interests rights." 

First, it seems that to the Yoon Administration vested interests is simply a code word for smashing workers and labor unions. Last year, Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering's subcontract workers went on strike for 51 days to demand a return to their wages, down 31% from 2014. While the strike ended with a negotiated 4.5% wage increase set by the company, the Yoon administration called the strike illegal from the beginning and threatened to exercise its public authority. After the strike ended, Daewoo Shipbuilding claimed 47 billion won in damages from its workers.

In addition, cargo truckers union began a strike, demanding that the government continue to implement the safe freight system - a system that determines and announces the minimum fare required to prevent overwork, speeding, and overloading and protects traffic safety-  and expand the applicable items. When the government agreed to discuss their demands, the workers returned to work. Yet, the discussion had still not started 5 months later, forcing the cargo truckers union to announce going on strike. The discussions finally began only to be derailed when the government stated that "if the safe freight system expands, there is concern about the expanding power of the unionized cargo truckers." When they went on strike, the government compared the strike to a "North Korean nuclear threat" calling it a "national threat."

The Yoon administration propagates images of greedy and corrupt unions by declaring that "vested" trade unions are committing illegal activities. Recently, the government demanded trade unions submit their accounting data, saying that the unions need to transparently disclose how they spent the 3.5 billion won in last year’s state subsidies. The problem, however, is that access to these accounting documents will also allow the government to determine who is part of the union. These actions have a weak legal basis and counters international norms such as the International Labor Organization (ILO). Worse, no such demand is made of organizations such as the Korea Employers Federation or the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry that received 20 times more government subsidies (70 billion won). In addition, the president's office has stated that even if it was passed in the National Assembly, it would veto the “Yellow Envelope Act” (which amended Articles 2 and 3 of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act), which guarantees workers' right to unionize, holds the president of a company responsible for wrongdoing or industrial accidents, and limits suits brought for damage against striking workers.

Given his treatment of workers, how does the Yoon administration respond to the illegal actions of corporations, the real "vested interests”. Last year, the heads of the major chaebol (conglomerates), including Samsung and Lotte, were released from prison by presidential pardon on Independence Day, thus reaffirming the common belief that "the chaebols stand above the law.” In addition, at the end of last year, the government and ruling party pushed a 1% cut on corporate taxes. Furthermore, the Yoon administration is revising the Serious Disaster Punishment Act, which went into effect last year, towards replacing the criminal punishment clause for managers with administrative sanctions such as fines. In fact, the Yoon administration protects and supports the "real vested rights" while framing workers as "vested interests.”

In response, industrial trade unions and the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions declared a general strike this May and July. This will be an important moment to break the framework of the Yoon administration's "vest interest” union and create counter-discourses to create support from below. Just as eight French trade union groups went on strike in Jan. against Macron's pension reforms raising the retirement age from 62 to 64 both in large cities and the regions, it is important to gain support not only from workers but also from ordinary citizens and students. We need to reveal who the actual vested interests are and who benefits from spreading hatred of trade unions and strikes. The International Strategy Center will also join in the fight against the real vested interests. 

  Is Food Stable Amidst Inflation?

Written by Son, Jong-pil (Policy Team)

Translated by Song, Dae-Han (Networking Team)

 Source: Sisa Journal, Issue 1740, [Data News] 
The "Domestic Food Self-sufficiency Rate" is below 50%.
Beyond an economic problem, the issue of food is a matter of survival. In a world, where global factors, outside our control,  amplify volatility, government policy to manage this is important. This is why agriculture should not be approached simply from an economic perspective especially in the age of climate crisis. Unlike industrial products, food should not be considered a product that can simply be imported if we do not have enough. 
Social Movement 101

edited by: Matthew Phillips and Dae-Han Song

Ana Cha is a member of MST’s National Coordination and does work at the national school with the International and political education collectives. She has been a member of the MST for the past 20 years and became involved in the northeast part of Brazil. We interviewed her for our monthly ISC Progressive Forum on Sunday Feb. 19th. The interview was carried out by the International Strategy Center’s Zoe Yungmi Blank and Mike Cannon.  

The MST has been called one of Latin America's largest and strongest movements, having emerged from dictatorship during a period of democratization in 1984. The MST now has a base of 1.5 million people and has settled 350,000 families with 90,000 families encamped awaiting recognition. The MST land occupations are justified under the 1988 constitution, mandating for land and to serve social function. Yes, for those of us living outside of Brazil or new to this issue, imagining tens of thousands of rural, landless workers entering private property and occupying it sounds radical, even revolutionary, and you've managed to settle 350,000 families in this way. What makes such radical actions possible?


In Brazil, 1% of the land owners own 50% of the land. When MST started to organize the workers in the early 1980s the vast majority of those lands were unproductive. And there was a huge contingent of people in the countryside who had no place to work or to live. There was even a very hungry [impoverished, immiserated] situation. So land occupation was and still is a tool to denounce this situation. Occupying the land has the main goal of putting pressure on the government to expropriate these lands for agrarian reform. Of course, these radical actions provoke a lot of violence on the part of the landowners. 


In the Brazilian constitution there is a mandate as regards “the social function” of land which says that a land must be productive socially, that is it must be producing food and / or it must be producing a livelihood for families. If it is proven that that land is unproductive, the government must expropriate that land. Alongside land occupations, there are other forms of struggle such as negotiations, big marches, public acts to put pressure on the government. But our movement is a mass movement, constantly applying pressure all the time, being backed by the legal framework of the existing constitution, so we consider our actions here to be very radical, but from another point of view it is not so radical. Our successes are only possible because we are a mass movement who really organize a big amount of workers and landless.

Click below to watch an edited version of our event.
 [The 38th Korean Commemoration Rally

for International Women’s Day]

The ISC will join the rally to commemorate International Women’s Day. Please sign up at the link below to join the rally with us.


Date: March 4th (Sat) 2:30PM

Place: Seoul Plaza (City Hall station exit #5)

Sign up at: https://bit.ly/womensrallyseoul


* Dress Code: Please wear something purple

* After 5 PM, we are going to have dinner together.

* On March 1st at 4 pm, we are going to create our pickets with quotes from Korean and international women activists at the ISC office.

2F, 2 Dosin-ro 47-gil, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul International Strategy Center